The verdict on MotoGP’s new steward after opening races

The team discuss Simon Crafar’s start to life as chief steward in the late𒆙st Crash MotoGP Podc💟ast

Simon Crafar, MotoGP 2024
Simon Crafar, MotoGP 2024
© Gold and Goose

The start to the new MotoGP season has also 🗹seen a new era of stewarding begin, as ex-racer and TV pundit Simon Crafar takes 🌌on the role as head FIM steward.

MotoGP stewarding has come in for a lot of flak in recent years und♓er double 50🌌0cc world champion Freddie Spencer’s leadership.

Consistency of penalty calls wꦫas one of the biggest complaints, 🅷as was a lack of transparency.

Coming into 2025, Crafar has a tough task on his hands to rebuild faith in the stewarding process while also ensuring the FIM rulebook ♊is follo𝓀wed.

But after ꩲtwo rounds, the verdict on Crafar’s stewarding has been overwhelmingly positive.

168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Marco Bezzecchi got an official warning, whichꦑ seems like a sensible move I think because he didn’t bring any other riders down,” Crash MotoGP Editor Peter McLaren began in the lates𝔉t Crash MotoGP Podcast.

“He did affect 168澳洲幸运5官方开奖结果历史:Fabio Quartararo’s race, but he didn’t destroy it because Quartararo in the end got a couple of poꦓints.

“But in the end, h🥂e did make con🐈tact with another rider, he did make a mistake.

“So, I think an official warning for a first offen𒁃ce [is good]🔯. Presumably if there is a carbon copy incident then he would get a penalty next time, which is fair enough.

“I thought it was interesting to see that. Where it be♓comes a harder call with these first offences is when it’s a bigger incident, when othe🔯r riders get brought down.

“So if you’re in another team you’d say ‘it was my riders first offence, same as Bez, right?❀’

“So that’s when it becomes difficult in the future with these things, but there’s never any easy answer for first-corner incidents. Bez held his hands up, first offence so offiꦿcial warning, which I think is fair enough.”

It is understood that a more serious first offence would skip the warning process and go straight to a penalty while one of the aims of the new-look FIM Stewards panel is to protect🌳 riders from repeat offenders by ramping up the punishments.

In other words, ever꧙yone can make a mistake, but a rider can't keep making the 🎶same mistake. 

S༺o in the case of creating a dangerous situation at the start or opening lap - which is deemed worse than later in a race since riders are more closely packed - a warning or double long lap for a first offence would be followed by a double long lap for a second offence, then a ride-through penalty for a third offence, to punish those that keep putting other riders at risk by making the same error.

Bezzecchi, Quartararo, Turn 1, 2025 Argentine MotoGP
Bezzecchi, Quartararo, Turn 1, 2025 Argentine MotoGP

Crash Senior Journalist Le🔴wis Duncan echoed McLaren’s thoughts, while noting one area Crafar’s stewarding could excel over his predecessor.

“In🌞teresting on the first offence thing,” Duncan sa🔯id.

“I think the stewardin♉g for the most part to begin the Simon Crafar era ღas head steward has been pretty spot on.

“I t꧒hink, yes ok Freddie Spencer was an ex-racer, but I think Simon Crafar being a bit more recent of an ex-rac💞er - let’s say - but someone who continues to ride bikes fairly in anger.

“He does all of his BMW laps [at race weekends], so he’s quite fresh, he understands what the circuits are like everyও weekend.

ও“And being a TV pundit for all these years he understands the riders, he understands🎶 the racing situation, he understands the development of the bikes.

“There does seem to be a much more bigger picture approach to s🥃tewarding now, which I think is good. Let’s hope that continues.

“I think the firsꦜt offence thing is an interesting one, but I guess the way to look at it is Bez ruined his own race, took himself 🌃out.

“Yes, he compromised Quartararo but tꦰhat was a Turn 1 racing incident. Had he wiped out Fabio and a couple of othe🐠rs, that would have been a first offence - but a more serious offence.

“And that seems to b🌠e the way they’re going. If you look at the Morbidelli incident with Binder in the sprint was a clear-cut race incident and ♔that’s what it was deemed.

“They were very prope༒r when it came to giving [Franco] Morbidelli a penalty for getting in🅰 the way of [Pecco] Bagnaia in Thailand.

“[David] Munoz had a pretty stupid inci﷽dent in Thailand and they gave him a pretty hard pen𒁃alty to reflect that.

“It does seem like the stewarding is assessing penalties in a much better way that there is an actual clear punishment there rat෴her than something innocuous the rider can brush off.

“I don’t think anyone tho𓆉ught Crafar wouldn’t do a good job, b꧅ut they’ve had a lot of varied incidents and the calls I think have been spot on.

“The thing I would hope with Crafar, which we didn’t get wit🔜h Spencer, was coming out on camera and𝄹 giving an explanation [of a penalty].

“But Crafar being a TV guy, being comfortable in front of cameras, hopefully when there is an incident like that he can come out and say ‘ok, he♒re’s why it’s a penalty’.

“I think ⛄there’s a lot of really positive things coming out here and it’s been long-needed.🙈”

Read More