Ferrari chief Mattia Binotto says he views having two t🍸op drivers as a “luxury” amid the latest controversy between Sebastian Vettel and Charles Leclerc in Formula 1’s Russian Gr🐟and Prix.

Tensions rose at the Scuderia in Sochi as Vettel ignored team orders to allow polesitt🎃er Leclerc back ahead after the Monegasque had let his four-time world champion teammate into the lead at the start of the race.

Leclerc insisted he had followed a pre-race agreement in the team’s bid to try and secure a second consecutive one-two finish, but Vettel wanted to remain ahead. The German ultimately retired from the race shortly after his first p♋it stop when he suffered an MGU-K failure.

The incide👍nt resulted in a Virtual Safety Car period that ironically enabled Mercedes to take advantage as Lewis Hamil🀅ton headed an unlikely one-two for the team to land its first win since F1's summer break.

Asked how he will deal with having the toughest management job in F1, Binotto replied: “I still beli🐻eve it is a luxury.

“I s🍷⛦till believe it is a luxury because we have two fantastic drivers.”

Binotto insisted both drivers stuck to the tea🅷m🦩’s pre-race agreement and denied that Ferrari had stopped Leclerc earlier than Vettel to ensure he leapfrogged the German.

“Looking at the start, our judgement that the start went as planned, and therefore we thought it was right to ask Seb to swap the positions,” Binotto exp൲lained.

“Eventually the two drꦍivers may have different opinions by driving the car, but that is something which we may discuss with them.

“We initially asked Seb to give the position back, but fair enough to say at that stage in the race that maybe Charles was not close enough, an🤪d we would have lost some time on track.

“Later on, Seb was quite fast and gained some track advantage on Char🍰les. So we k🎀new that we could decide to do it later on.

“The undercut w𒁏as not for the reason f🐲or giving back the position to Charles,” he added.

“The undercut was as well because Charles stopped because he had worn tyres, his lefꦫt-rear was starting to be worn, so it was the right moment for him to pit.

“We knew as well that if we had stopped both our ca🌜rs there, we would have been vulnerable on Safety Cars by giving the lead to Hamilton, so we tried to stay out as much as we could with Seb, simply to protect in case of Safety Cars later in the race.

“Again, Seb’s tyres were worn, it was the right moment to pit. As a matter of fact, Charles was ahead, Seb was behind, but the race wasꦚ still not over and there would have been plenty of opportunity to decide with them what would have been the best option later on.”